AKA: STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING. The language of Barwis (spoken in a gravel-like rumble at 78 rpms, minimum). As many of you know, I have been calling for Mike Gittleson's head for AGES, but who knew that the transformation / evolution of Michigan's S&C program would be, ahem, Barwinian????
In an attempt to define and translate what the heck Barwis is doing, I went to what is clearly his "Origin of the Species"......The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research......proving that there is definitely method behind the man's madness.
THE GOAL: condition, speed, agility, balance, flexibility, power, explosiveness
MATERIALS:
1) FAST-TWITCH FIBERS + Olympic training movements = Explosiveness
Human skeletal muscle contains 2 muscle fiber types: slow twitch (type I) and fast twitch (type II). The slow twitchers are involved in sustained strength movements and provide endurance. Fast twitchers are best at quick force generation and fine motor activities. Slow twitchers have a
long latency period, meaning you fire them, and they provide a long, strong contraction but then take a while to recover. (sound like anything we know Catie???? )anywho.....
Fast twitch fibers however, can be recruited quickly, with maximal force generation and then recover quickly---but they can fatigue faster. SO, by recruiting fast-twitch fibers you get an explosive response in terms of quickness and amount of force generated, but you can flame out quickly. (as it were, so to speak, DRINK YOUR MILK)
Fast twitch fibers however, can be recruited quickly, with maximal force generation and then recover quickly---but they can fatigue faster. SO, by recruiting fast-twitch fibers you get an explosive response in terms of quickness and amount of force generated, but you can flame out quickly. (as it were, so to speak, DRINK YOUR MILK)
Barwis' Olympic weight lifting regimen involves (wait for it)...THE TWO HAND SNATCH and THE CLEAN AND JERK (heh heh heh, tee hee)
That's why the weight room is now full of free weights. It's all about reps, weight, and recovery....reps, weight, and recovery....REPEAT!!!!!
2) BALANCE & FUNCTIONAL AREA, control in 3D space. This seems to encompass a
lot of things for Barwis. First he wants to stabilize things ANTERIOR TO POSTERIOR ie, building up agonist/antagonist muscle groups. Think biceps/triceps pairs or hammy/quad pairs. Delts/Lats. Pec Major/Trapezius. Rectus abdominus/Erector spinae. Iliospoas/Gluts. Tibialis anterior(shin)/Gastrocnemius (calf). The agonist is the muscle being exercised, while the antagonist acts in opposition to the agonist. You want the two muscle groups to be balanced to avoid injury since you wouldn't want your quads stronger than your hammys.....OUCH!
lot of things for Barwis. First he wants to stabilize things ANTERIOR TO POSTERIOR ie, building up agonist/antagonist muscle groups. Think biceps/triceps pairs or hammy/quad pairs. Delts/Lats. Pec Major/Trapezius. Rectus abdominus/Erector spinae. Iliospoas/Gluts. Tibialis anterior(shin)/Gastrocnemius (calf). The agonist is the muscle being exercised, while the antagonist acts in opposition to the agonist. You want the two muscle groups to be balanced to avoid injury since you wouldn't want your quads stronger than your hammys.....OUCH! This concept then leads to something he refers to as:
3) FUNCTIONAL FLEXIBILITY PROGRESSIONS, active movements, dynamic flexibility, and static stretches. Basically the idea here is to increase flexibility and stretch on the muscle groups so that the range of motion around a joint is not limited by the muscless' inflexibility. You want to increase the flexibility of all the things connected to the joint thereby preventing resistance from one's own musculature in whatever action you are trying to perform at a joint. The science isn't as robust around static stretches---I won't bore you with the 129+ articles I found but basically for every article that says that stretching helps performance, there is another one that says not so much. But this leads into what Barwis calls
4) INJURY PREVENTION AND "PRE-HAB", His point is that AFTER an injury at a joint occurs the treatment is all about strengthing surrounding muscle groups to support the joint, increasing tendon strength and length etc. He (rightly I think) says HEY, let's do that stuff BEFORE someone gets injured....
Case and point?? Women and ACL injuries. Women have a rate of ACL injury 2-8 times higher than that of men, particularly in sports such as soccer and basketball. The original research was done by U of M's own Dr. Ed Wojtys, Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, and a member of the
1972 Football Team. He and his group (among a zillion others) have done extensive research showing that you can decrease non-contact ACL injuries in women by neuromuscular strength training, teaching appropriate jumping and landing techniques, and of course---the right shooooooes.
1972 Football Team. He and his group (among a zillion others) have done extensive research showing that you can decrease non-contact ACL injuries in women by neuromuscular strength training, teaching appropriate jumping and landing techniques, and of course---the right shooooooes.Walking us right into>>>>
5) CORE TRANSFER, where you strengthen the core muscle groups such as the abs/low back/pelvis/spine in order to provide a stable center thru which force can be transferred, stabilized, and/or generated. This prevents buckling or twisting of the back and hips providing a strength and power advantage. How does one do this you ask??? By using an unstable apparatus like a crazy-ass exercise ball, balance board, or heaven forbid...performing pilates. The instability triggers ones' proprioceptors, which are sensors within a muscle providing your brain with information about joint angle, muscle length and tension as well as your own sense of self in space. By training on an unstable surface you actually train yourself to adjust in 3D space more quickly and accurately--as Barwis says, think about a wide receiver reaching back across his body to catch a ball, or a running back making a quick juke move....
"whammo"
6) PLYOMETRICS AND EXPLOSIVE TRAINING thru impulse training and the
development of muscle elasticity/rebound (aka the stretch reflex). Basically developing springlike action within the muscles to transfer potential energy to kinetic energy. BOING!!!!
development of muscle elasticity/rebound (aka the stretch reflex). Basically developing springlike action within the muscles to transfer potential energy to kinetic energy. BOING!!!!WTF are plyometrics you ask??? Things like two-foot ankle hops; 15-cm cone hops; tuck, pike, and box jumps; one- and two-leg vertical jump and reach; squat jumps. Basically stuff that will KILL you at first, but make you strong grasshopper in the end...Not yet a believer?
Take a look at the science as demonstrated by women in bikinis on the beach. REALLY!
Marques, MC, van den Tillaar, R, Vescovi, JD, and Gonzalez-Badillo, JJ. Changes in strength and power performance in elite senior female professional volleyball players
during the in-season: a case study. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1147-1155, 2008
during the in-season: a case study. J Strength Cond Res 22: 1147-1155, 2008It is often recommended that in-season training programs aim to maintain muscular strength and power developed during the off-season. However, improvements in performance may be possible with a well-designed training regimen. The purpose of this case report is to describe the changes in physical performance after an in-season training regimen in professional female volleyball players in order to determine whether muscular strength and power might be improved. Apart from normal practice sessions, 10 elite female volleyball players completed 2 training sessions per week, which included both resistance training and plyometric exercises. Over the 12-week season, the athletes performed 3-4 sets of 3-8 repetitions for resistance and plyometric exercises during each training session. All sessions were supervised by one of the investigators as well as by the team head coach. Muscular strength and power were assessed before and after the 12-week training program using 4 repetition maximum bench press and parallel squat tests, an overhead medicine ball throw (BTd), as well as unloaded and loaded countermovement jumps (CMJs). Strength improved by 15% and 11.5% in the bench press and parallel squat, respectively. Hope you liked the healing picture because Mikey B also digs.
7) BIOENERGETICS which, fingers crossed, is not this, but rather the study and understanding of energy utilization within human tissues. Things
like aerobic and anaerobic metabolism, oxidative stress, heat transfer, and nutrition extraction, maybe?????? I'm willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt....
Add it all up, and here are the RESULTS, which many of you have already seen---but maybe now we can all understand.....????
like aerobic and anaerobic metabolism, oxidative stress, heat transfer, and nutrition extraction, maybe?????? I'm willing to give the guy the benefit of the doubt....Add it all up, and here are the RESULTS, which many of you have already seen---but maybe now we can all understand.....????
GOT IT????
GOOD, cuz here comes Barwis' F*%& LION (work alert)



17 comments:
i feel like i need a glass of chocolate milk after just reading all that.
Nice Post! Motivating to say the least! Although I thought snatch was slang for...........
PS....coaches poll has Michigan at 24. (That might be old news, but I just happened to see it today)
i guess i don't get it
west virginia had a losing record overall against teams over .500 since richrod & barwis came along
they didn't start winning their conference until the big dogs left the conference
their record of sending players to the pros is mediocre, even when they were winning in recent years
you can say that they didn't have great recruiting classes and such but it's not like they turned those mediocre recruits in to nfl players, nor did they turn those mediocre recruits into a team that consistently beat teams over .500
so is it that barwis system gets guys in shape but doesn't do enough to beat the big boys consistently? or is it rodriquez's coaching that can't get it done?
either way, i wonder if the barwis hype turns out to be the emperor wearing no clothes. will michigan be the best conditioned 6-6 team in the nation?
on the toss of the coin, andy and titleix have been kicking ass with articles like this. i liked yost's blog a lot, but it ended up mostly as a bash-osu, bash-msu, etc blog - not a lot of meat but funny as hell nonetheless. you two have already put out (yes i said titleix put out) 3 or 4 in depth articles that i was really impressed with.
good job and keep it up - oh and strive to be the anti-"michigan against the world blog". taking articles and interjecting the comments with an 8 year old mindset after every sentence is comical, in a sad sense.
Thanks for the compliment Sru.
I've known T9 for 24+ years, and she has always been the brains in this relationship.
Regarding RR+Barwis. I can see your point. WVU was not a clssic powerhouse in the sense that Youngstown State was -- but those 2 BCS wins (Georgia & Oklahoma) has gotten everyone all lathered up.
We will see.
Sru,
since T9 says only lawyers do their math out loud, let me try to explain it this way:
2 & 3 star recruits (typical WVV recruiting class since the days of Bobby Bowden) + Mike Barwis conditioning + R2 coaching = 11-2 season w/ dramatic ass kicking of OU.
so, if you take that formula to Michigan:
4 & 5 star recruits + Mike Barwis conditioning + R2 coaching = ???
in theory, it should add up to a higher result, since you are starting w/ a more talented roster. the kids on Michigan's roster now were all more highly regarded than all but a couple of the kids on WVU's.
frankly, even if there isn't a "bump" because of the wider talent base and the formula only adds up to an 11-2 season w/ dramatic ass kicking of (insert BCS bowl opponent name here) like it has @ WVU the past few seasons? that's a big up tick for us. Lloyd hasn't had that kind of season since '99.
sru makes some excellent points (sexual innuendos aside)
I'm still very hopeful about this new regime. you take better athletic "specimens" if you will, train 'em up and then they become superheroes. plus they then become a product of their environment--ie the winningest program in college football history....
I'm still calling for 8 wins this season.
But, I also see sru's point and hope that this ain't all snake oil and mirrors
and, to my bro andy---
a) I'm the BEAUTY in this team, sheez! and
b) please don't point out how old we are!!! ;-)
love you man. truly
sic - why don't we see the three star recruits turned into monsters like we do at osu?
2002
nick mangold 1 star
aj hawk ***
2003
ashton youboty ***
2004
antonio pittman ***
vernon gholston ***
2005
brian robiskie **
malcolm jenkins ***
james laurinaitis ***
hell even michigan with their dinosaur strength and conditioning program (as michigan fans now refer to carr's s&c program) turned plenty of 1,2, and 3 * recruits into great players
2002
david harris *
larry harrison jr *** ;)
2003
shawn crable ***
2006
greg matthews
ok maybe you guys haven't been that good at it!
you can throw in the 'star rankings don't mean anything' argument but is it coincidental that the star rankings on so many osu players were wrong but the rankings on wvu were spot on???
finally, your math was indeed lacking - i've fixed it for you...
2 & 3 star recruits + Mike Barwis conditioning + R2 coaching + no miami, no virginia tech, no boston college = dramatic turnaround in their season record, from 7-8 wins per year to 10-11. but of course it's another wvu coincident!
andy - i thought titleix was only 21 - how can you know her for 24 years?!?!?!
Robiskie? Really? The other ones were fine but don't try flinging Robiskie past us. Maybe it's because Boeckman is so not good that Robiskie looks so barely average.
sru--clearly you forget that larry harrison jr was an EXPERT at the clean and jerk.....
thanks to andy for the clean up on the visuals--guess he IS the purty one in this team ;-)
numbers don't matter when you are still 12 in your own mind.
robiskie will be a 2nd round draft pick in April
mark it down
from a ** prospect
titleix - great comment on harrison!
although i think it was more the jerk and run
Sru,
Your point on the Big East is over cooked. It's like judging tosu by their record against ranked non conference opponents- look too closely & it's not too pretty by itself.
So let's make it a simpler equation- I'll take either the team that beat UGa or OU, ok? That level of talnet, that level of play. That level of competition. That's what I expect (if not immediately, by next season) Barwis' conditioning & R2's coaching to produce.
actually it's the same as what people are saying about osu the last two years - overrated because we beat up on a weak big 10.
our record against ranked non-conference foes is actually pretty good, even including the last two bowl games.
beat #9 ND, 1-1 against texas including winning in austin when they were ranked #2, beat ok st, beat #10 kansas state, beat #1 miami, beat #7 washington state
so i'm not sure what you were getting at - our last 3 non-conf losses were to #2 texas, #2 florida and #1 lsu - all 3 teams won the national championship the year we lost to them...
sure, looks real good, until you stare @ it too long. Last 3 seasons, 5 ranked non conference opponents, 2-3 record. Losses to UT, Fla, & LSU. Wins against ND & UT.
But then, the two SECOND losses were pretty much butt kickings. And the wins? ND was the most over rated ranked team ever (seriously, you really go around boasting about that win?) And the win @ UT? Yeah, #2 then, but ended up with 4 losses (& had to come from behind to beat 6-7 Iowa to avoid a 5th loss).
So stare at it a while & you realize tosu hasn't won over a good non conference opponent in 3 seasons.
i thought michigan last year preseason was the most overrated ranked team ever?
again our last 3 losses against ranked non-conf opponents were to the eventual division 1-a national champions
somehow that's a bad thing?
tell your great grandkids to text my great grandkids the first time michigan GETS to consecutive national championship games - if they have texting decades from now that is
for the record, michigan's record against ranked non-conference foes since 2003 is 2-5 with one of those wins against the same most overrated team ever 2006 Notre Dame.
i also like how YOU stated the 'ranked non-conference teams' measuring stick, without a time frame. then added the "good" ranked non-conference teams AND the three year time frame after i posted the actual results using your initial measuring stick
then again, they say you can manipulate stats to get whatever results you're looking for.
Sru,
for a man who supposedly has so much to be happy about, you seem awfully pissy.
yeah, we haven't beaten much of anyone outside the conference in a while. that's partly how i know we haven't been very good. but you haven't beaten anybody either. what should that tell you?
that said, your statements about how poor michigan has been over the last few years are pretty much useless. our coach & the program grew stale, the on field performance suffered, and he's gone now.
it's "morning in michigan" and all the old records are about as meaningful as Cooper's @ tosu- history.
BTW- i chose the last 3 seasons because they're probably the best (record wise) for tosu- 10+ wins each season. tosu lost 4 games in '04 and lost to Michigan in '03.
cheer up- only about 5 weeks until you put the whupping on USC and show the world how great tosu really is, right?
Post a Comment